Does Califonia need 3 times as many Senators?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 20 of total 53 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
couchmaster

climber
Topic Author's Original Post - Jun 12, 2018 - 07:12pm PT

It's going to be on the ballot. http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-california-split-three-states-20180612-story.html

Last time was West Virginia when some state got so pissed off they split from the state they were part of. The republicans, just formed to get rid of slavery and a bunch of rabble rousers, supported the move due to the civil war. It will be interesting to watch this go round.

opps, I'd like to buy an R Alex.....
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 12, 2018 - 07:48pm PT
Let me see Wyoming pop. 580,000 and California pop. 39,500,000 both have two Senators...seems wrong to me,
skywalker1

Trad climber
co
Jun 12, 2018 - 08:41pm PT
Isn't 2 per state the purpose? Even voice so Wyoming doesn't get steam rolled by Cali or Delaware doesn't get steam rolled by Pennsylvania? House of Rep different as to give everyone a rep but in equally small tribes say, so more Reps. No? The latter has become a bit weird now because of "gerry mandering".

S.....

Edit: My bust I see what is being proposed. Godspeed.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 12, 2018 - 08:43pm PT
It was the purpose in 1787 and made some sense then...same for the second amendment...both need further amending to work in today’s world.
looks easy from here

climber
Ben Lomond, CA
Jun 12, 2018 - 08:48pm PT
Isn't 2 per state the purpose?
Yes, but the proposal is to break California into 3 states, not just to increase its representation in the Senate.
Bruce Morris

Trad climber
Soulsbyville, California
Jun 12, 2018 - 11:44pm PT
Sounds like a pipe dream like the so-called 'State of Jefferson' movement with just as much a chance of being enacted.
Robb

Social climber
Cat Box
Jun 13, 2018 - 12:13am PT
Good grief! You guys DO understand how our government is constructed to operate, right?
skywalker1

Trad climber
co
Jun 13, 2018 - 12:36am PT
^^^ Yes from a high school civics class that didn't have the funding for a textbook. ;-)



S...
justthemaid

climber
Jim Henson's Basement
Jun 13, 2018 - 04:43am PT
That would totally mess up our awesome flag.
Gunkie

Trad climber
Valles Marineris
Jun 13, 2018 - 05:22am PT
California needs about 4x the number of electoral college votes to match Montana on a per capita basis.
Keith Reed

climber
Johnson county TX
Jun 13, 2018 - 08:12am PT
No.
And don’t spilt into 3. The last dude that was running the division of California moved back to Russia. Not kidding.

A better plan would be to add seats to the House of Representatives so that states with larger populations have more representation.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Jun 13, 2018 - 09:10am PT
I think there would be much more responsive and representative governments if they drew the 3 state boundaries differently:
1. SF and silicon valley (possibly north to Santa Rosa and South to Hollister but not Salinas, and maybe east as far as Tracy)
2. LA Basin and San Diego
3. Everything else


Then you address the problems of city-centric vs rural-centric values, and could have more representative state governments for gun laws, abortion, social assistance programs, etc. It could get nasty with inter-state ownership of water rights and new laws that assess taxes and fees on water transferring out of state. That would probably become an issue with the proposed divisions anyways.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 13, 2018 - 09:32am PT
Let me see Wyoming pop. 580,000 and California pop. 39,500,000 both have two Senators...seems wrong to me,

If the US as a whole want to apportion Senate seats by population, as we do in the House, I'm 100% for it.

The whole purpose of a bicameral legislature is to see that differing interests are fairly represented. Each state gets two senators so that each state can work equally for it's own interests. The House represents the people, which is why it has the power of the purse. If we apportion Senators the same way we apportion Representatives we might just as well do away with the Senate. What, after all, would be its purpose?

To say that it's unfair for bigger and smaller states to have the same number of Senators is to totally not get it.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 13, 2018 - 10:29am PT
This little PBS "Crash Course" is obviously meant as a teaching tool for a young audience, but it is a pretty clear explanation of why Congress is structured the way it is. It's a worthwhile 8 mins.

https://www.pbs.org/video/crash-course-government-2/
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Jun 13, 2018 - 10:30am PT
They provide all the food for the world and all the technology.

Now now, you know what they say about exaggerating.
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jun 13, 2018 - 12:02pm PT
I think it should be divided into 80 states so we have the same federal representation as Wyoming.


However it may be divided, it should be into equal populations (which eliminates the state of "Jefferson), and gerrymandered to be as blue as possible.

Also, the following should be combined into one state: Montana, WY, ID, NV, SD, ND, UT, Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 13, 2018 - 12:32pm PT
Everybody here is so much wiser than the Founding Fathers.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 13, 2018 - 12:39pm PT
Everybody here is so much wiser than the Founding Fathers.

Not me. That's why I think we have the best founding documents in history.
johntp

Trad climber
socal
Jun 13, 2018 - 12:50pm PT
Yes, but the proposal is to break California into 3 states, not just to increase its representation in the Senate.

That actually makes sense given the diversity and population.
10b4me

Social climber
Lida Junction
Jun 13, 2018 - 01:02pm PT
Yes, but the proposal is to break California into 3 states, not just to increase its representation in the Senate.

correct.

what idiot came up with those boundaries?

Edit: no cal, as proposed would be ok. central cal would extend to the Tehachapis, and everything south of there would be so cal.
Messages 1 - 20 of total 53 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta