Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
stunewberry
Trad climber
Spokane, WA
|
|
Topic Author's Original Post - Jan 22, 2017 - 04:10pm PT
|
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/19/bureau-land-management-federal-lease
"In the midst of highly publicized steps to dismantle insurance coverage for 32 million people and defund women’s healthcare facilities, Republican lawmakers have quietly laid the foundation to give away Americans’ birthright: 640m acres of national land. In a single line of changes to the rules for the House of Representatives, Republicans have overwritten the value of federal lands, easing the path to disposing of federal property even if doing so loses money for the government and provides no demonstrable compensation to American citizens.
"At stake are areas managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Forests and Federal Wildlife Refuges, which contribute to an estimated $646bn each year in economic stimulus from recreation on public lands and 6.1m jobs. Transferring these lands to the states, critics fear, could decimate those numbers by eliminating mixed-use requirements, limiting public access and turning over large portions for energy or property development."
Click the link to read the article.
|
|
monolith
climber
state of being
|
|
Jan 22, 2017 - 08:56pm PT
|
Lets hope the courts can step in when the lawsuits start. Devaluing the land to nothing so they can be given to the states is obvious fraud.
Patagonia and BlackDiamond have threatened to pull out of the OR Utah show if this continues in Utah.
|
|
thebravecowboy
climber
The Good Places
|
|
Jan 22, 2017 - 09:12pm PT
|
thank you for sharing this disturbing news.
I will be goddamned if they are going to privatize my (our) federal land.
Public land is worth more than nothing.
Coincidentally I just bought a power drill and renewed my PP
|
|
seano
Mountain climber
none
|
|
Jan 22, 2017 - 09:25pm PT
|
...authored by Utah Republican...
I'm not sure I could be less surprised. Extractive industry companies have more leverage against smaller entities (i.e. states). And what state has more to sell than Moroni's?
|
|
jgill
Boulder climber
The high prairie of southern Colorado
|
|
Jan 22, 2017 - 09:26pm PT
|
An unwelcome development. If only America didn't have to exist in a political thermostat, with Democrats pushing strongly to the left and Republicans pushing strongly to the right. You would think there would be a middle ground.
|
|
survival
Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
|
|
Jan 22, 2017 - 09:28pm PT
|
Time to start making a lot of noise to our representatives.
|
|
Todd Eastman
climber
Bellingham, WA
|
|
Jan 22, 2017 - 09:30pm PT
|
Fruck Tump...
... and his minions!
|
|
Steve Grossman
Trad climber
Seattle, WA
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 10:32am PT
|
The ghost of James Watt has been seen clumsily bumping around in the halls of power.
Perhaps the end is near as the means certainly are.
|
|
Jorroh
climber
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 10:39am PT
|
JGill said..."Democrats pushing strongly to the left and Republicans pushing strongly to the right"
You don't actually believe that do you? This sort of false equivalency is either ignorance or dishonesty.
|
|
c wilmot
climber
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 10:47am PT
|
Did Obama did not realize this would happen as he used executive orders to put more land in control of the Feds with a republican controlled house And senate? Of course he did. Good cop Obama handed the keys over to bad cop trump.
The antiquities act simply needs to be amended and poof- all the land Obama "saved" while not even attempting to work with the house and senate to fund such acquisitions can be put up for sale.
The parties are working together alright. Predictably screwing over Americans
It would be an entertaining show if it wasn't so tragic
|
|
Bob D'A
Trad climber
Taos, NM
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 10:49am PT
|
"An unwelcome development. If only America didn't have to exist in a political thermostat, with Democrats pushing strongly to the left and Republicans pushing strongly to the right. You would think there would be a middle ground.'
So saving public lands, education and healthcare are pushing it way left?
Hope you are well John?
|
|
Craig Fry
Trad climber
So Cal.
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 10:53am PT
|
The Left are Now the Center
They want what 75% of America wants
They want the Federal Lands to stay Federal lands and will fight against the Far Right Republicans that are hell bent on selling them off
|
|
guyman
Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 11:05am PT
|
Gents.... I think that the State of California will be able to manage land just fine. Like it already does.
good post willmont and Jgill.
|
|
Craig Fry
Trad climber
So Cal.
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 11:17am PT
|
^^^
California will manage Only because it is controlled by Democrats (Centrists)
If it was controlled by Republicans, then you could kiss it all goodbye
so wrong Wilmot and JGill
You blame Obama for this, that's really reaching
#sad
and BTW, Obama isn't the left, so you words mean nothing
|
|
fear
Ice climber
hartford, ct
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 11:40am PT
|
The federal gov't thinks it owns most of the middle east.
You think some bogus "states rights" silliness would ever prevent them from taking whatever they wanted if necessary?
Thankfully, most of our vertical parks are pretty rough and worthless in terms of traditional resource value.
|
|
stevep
Boulder climber
Salt Lake, UT
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 11:59am PT
|
Did Obama did not realize this would happen as he used executive orders to put more land in control of the Feds with a republican controlled house And senate? Of course he did. Good cop Obama handed the keys over to bad cop trump.
The highest profile change Obama made, declaring the Bears Ears NM here in UT, didn't really put more land in control of the Feds. It was mostly already BLM or National Forest (small amount of state land is being swapped in trade for other BLM land). All the National Mon declaration did was better protect land that the Feds already owned.
And quite a lot of the rest of the territory was declarations of National Marine Preserves. i.e., it's under water.
And the Repub and western state push back on this is a big problem. Here in UT the leaders are frequently developers or have strong ties to developers. They have no intention of doing anything other than trying to make money off these deals.
|
|
John M
climber
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 12:20pm PT
|
Many years ago here in Arizona, the state was given a large block of land by the feds. It was put in a trust to help fund schools from the mining and grazing leases. This year Arizona voted to sell the land to help cover a shortage in school funding. This will help the schools for the next 5 years or so, then when that money is gone, the schools will be in a worse way as they will no longer have the lease money coming in. Short sighted thinking. Ack..
|
|
Steve Grossman
Trad climber
Seattle, WA
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 12:23pm PT
|
Up here in Washington state educational funding was tied to timber revenues with the result being a predictable thinning over time.
|
|
NutAgain!
Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
|
|
Jan 23, 2017 - 01:33pm PT
|
Gents.... I think that the State of California will be able to manage land just fine. Like it already does.
I have grown to strongly dislike California State Parks because it costs $30+/night to go car camping, for a picnic table and water spigot and access to a hot water shower with quarters, and typically need to book it out 6-12 months in advance to end up with a crowded experience. There are exceptions (e.g. early spring in Big Basin Redwoods when it is raining all day), but I avoid California State Parks now. For the more wild areas, California is placing stronger limits on off-trail use. Their basic model appears to me to be "if we can't afford a ranger to patrol it and give you tickets, we close it down," and "if we deem it wild, you can't go there."
Maybe it is my ignorance of California natural resources, but it seems we are forced into a false dichotomy of urbanized car-camping the same price as Motel6, or off-limits wildlands. I love the model of USFS and BLM that perfectly suits my erratic schedule and spontaneous adventures with my kids. I'm worried that the freedoms and experiences I have enjoyed will be curtailed.
Epilog: I do agree it was a deal with the devil for increasing Presidential powers in the last few Presidencies. I see the short-term desire to work around obstructionist Congresses, but the long-term consequences are a threat to the stability of our nation.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|