The United States Fire Service

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 4 of total 4 in this topic
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Topic Author's Original Post - Oct 1, 2014 - 09:32am PT
Today's LA Times:

Congress should fund fires for what they are -- disasters

By Dale N. Bosworth, Jack Ward Thomas and Michael Dombeck

Californians are all too familiar with the devastation forest fires bring. The state has already had more than 1,000 wildfires this year, and the worst of the fire season is just beginning. More than 350,000 acres of national forest have burned in Northern California so far in 2014. And each year recently, we've seen more and more acreage burn, and more homes and lives, as well as natural resources, put in jeopardy..

Not surprisingly, as wildfires have become more frequent and severe, the cost of battling them has also increased. In 1985, wildfire suppression cost the U.S. Forest Service about $240 million. In 2012, that number was $1.7 billion.

Not surprisingly, as wildfires have become more frequent and severe, the cost of battling them has also increased. In 1985, wildfire suppression cost the U.S. Forest Service about $240 million. In 2012, that number was $1.7 billion.

A lot of factors have contributed to the increase in fires — and the consequent increase in spending to suppress them — including a warming climate, drought and expanded development near fire-prone areas. But another reason for the growing number of fires has to do with the federal government's refusal to adapt to the growing threat.

A massive forest fire is a natural disaster in the same way a hurricane or tornado is. But while the government seems to understand that you can't budget for a hurricane, paying for the disaster out of a special emergency account funded specifically for that purpose, it still treats the cost of dealing with catastrophic fires as it does any other expenditure. An annual amount is budgeted to fight them, with little more than an estimate of what the fire season will actually bring.

This archaic method of funding fire suppression is wreaking havoc with Forest Service budgets, and it is also making it likely we'll see more and costlier fires.

In recent years, we've seen the United States Forest Service have to transform itself into the "United States Fire Service." Today, fire suppression accounts for more than half of the agency's budget. And even then, Congress isn't appropriating enough money to cover the true cost of battling fires, forcing the Forest Service to borrow from other, non-fire accounts.

This year, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced that the Forest Service had run out of money for fire suppression at the end of August, meaning "fire borrowing" had to begin. For the rest of the year, other Forest Service projects will have to be halted or severely curtailed, as money appropriated to fund them is diverted to pay for fire suppression. This is no way to run an agency.

Moreover, the borrowing may be ensuring that fires become more dangerous and more costly. As the Forest Service siphons money from other accounts to pay for battling fires, it has to cut back on programs expressly aimed at reducing fire risk. Millions have been diverted from hazardous fuels reduction, forest health management and vegetation management, all of which is likely to mean bigger fires in the future.

Thankfully, a sensible solution to this problem exists in the Wildfire Disaster Funding Act. This proposed legislation would finally treat America's most catastrophic wildfires in the way it treats other natural disasters, meaning that funds required to fight severe fires would be drawn from a federal emergency account rather than borrowed from other Forest Service programs. But Congress failed to take action on the bipartisan bill before it left for summer recess. For the sake of California's future, it is time for Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield) to put the Wildfire Disaster Funding Act on the House calendar.

The Wildfire Disaster Funding Act would allow hundreds of millions of dollars now diverted to fight fires to be restored to programs Congress intended to fund, including ones designed for wildfire prevention and forest health. That would in all likelihood result in fewer wildfires, healthier forests and better wildlife habitat. And, in the long term, it could save billions of federal dollars that are now, quite literally, going up in smoke.

Dale N. Bosworth served as chief of the United States Forest Service from 2001 to 2007. Jack Ward Thomas was chief from 1993 to 1996. Michael Dombeck was chief from 1997 to 2001.


http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-bosworth-fire-budget-20141001-story.html

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Will Congress do the right thang? Highly doubtful.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Oct 1, 2014 - 10:18am PT
Reilly-

I'll throw out another example of how the Fire Service handled things: in the North Laramie Range near Wheatland, Wyoming, 2 years ago, the 130,000+ acres that burned were a result of failure to remove diseased and dead timber. The area has been subject to a Pine Bark Beetle infestation for years, yet nothing was done to remove the dead and dying timber, creating a tinderbox situation. One lightning strike, and ....FOOM! Up in smoke went a lot of valuable timber, wildlife habitat, with many homes and ranches destroyed as a consequence. The NF is unusual with lots of private enclaves dotted throughout, and there has been speculation that the fire "control measures" were specifically designed to "burn out" the cabin owners and ranchers in order to gain control of still more land for the Fire Service.

We owned a tract of 160 acres in the NF, adjacent to the Laramie Peak Trail trailhead up until 2007 when it was sold to another private party. We owned the land for 14 years, and undertook removal of lots of dead and diseased timber for both fenceposts and firewood. Alas, that land was totally burned out, rendering it nearly worthless for the foreseeable future.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Oct 1, 2014 - 10:23am PT
With climate change Cali is toast (literally). It's time to consider giving it back to it's rightful owner...Mexico.
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Oct 1, 2014 - 12:35pm PT
Parque Nacional de Sequoia, etc.

I think JD is being facetious, Ron, though he seems to be baiting you...and you fell for it. :0)

We are a forum, not the law re-writers whose every decision is life or death.

Besides, he's from Colo.
Messages 1 - 4 of total 4 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta