Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 1 - 20 of total 100 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
murcy

Gym climber
sanfrancisco
Dec 31, 2012 - 05:32pm PT
Good question. I'd go for one with the top-load bobbin unless you're going to be playing a lot of baroque pieces.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Dec 31, 2012 - 05:42pm PT
The standard GENERIC OpenBSD kernel, as maintained by the project, is strongly recommended for universal use, and customized kernels are not supported by the project, in line with the philosophy that 'attempts to customize or "optimize" the kernel causes more problems than they solve.'

ya looking for problems?

BSD is open source code, why would there be an IP issue?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 31, 2012 - 06:24pm PT
Good question. I'd go for one with the top-load bobbin unless you're going to be playing a lot of baroque pieces.

Now that's a response to ring in the new year!

John
Malemute

Ice climber
the ghost
Dec 31, 2012 - 06:29pm PT
You need an eShredder.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Dec 31, 2012 - 06:38pm PT
I think this may help

zBrown

Ice climber
chingadero de chula vista
Dec 31, 2012 - 06:57pm PT
I'd say when your

packets sent = packets received = 0

you have reached equilibrium


healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Dec 31, 2012 - 07:10pm PT
You might want to consider kernel updates to the lithium, Abilify, and Xanax drivers.
justthemaid

climber
Jim Henson's Basement
Dec 31, 2012 - 07:42pm PT
English translation please?

The Hungarian phrasebook vid was helpful, but I need farther clarification. ;)
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 31, 2012 - 08:23pm PT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_UNIX

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USL_v._BSDi

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO-Linux_controversies

http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/bsdi/bsdisuit.html

http://www.levenez.com/unix/

The user formerly known as stzzo

climber
Sneaking up behind you
Dec 31, 2012 - 10:41pm PT
I'd use Ubuntu.

And dual-boot. External HD would be too slow.
Jim Brennan

Trad climber
Vancouver Canada
Dec 31, 2012 - 11:51pm PT
Try the original internet:


You will have to talk to their lawyers and know that they play rough...
justthemaid

climber
Jim Henson's Basement
Jan 1, 2013 - 10:59am PT
A disciple of another sect once came to Drescher as he was eating his morning meal. "I would like to give you this personality test," said the outsider, "because I want you to be happy." Drescher took the paper that was offered him and put it into the toaster: "I wish the toaster to be happy, too."
TwistedCrank

climber
Dingleberry Gulch, Ideeho
Jan 1, 2013 - 11:15am PT
Just type sudo rm -r / and enter the password. Basically this just tells the shell that your nipples are tingling with delight.
Hardman Knott

Gym climber
Muir Woods National Monument, Mill Valley, Ca
Jan 1, 2013 - 11:51am PT
Credit: Hardman Knott
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Jan 1, 2013 - 12:35pm PT
the BSD article in Wiki has two places where "kernel tuning" but the legal issues seemed to be about names rather than any tuning issues.

what years are you interested in? this bullshit has been going on for ever....

you probably need an attorney to deal with this, not a techie, since your concerns over legal actions have more to do with various companies defending their putative "copy rights" than with any real issues with the operating system.


http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tech-news/sco-loses-major-court-ruling-in-unix-lawsuit/997

http://aplawrence.com/Lawsuit/

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/sco-is-dead-sco-unix-lives-on/8685

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/another-nail-in-scos-linux-lawsuit-coffin/5925

http://www.groklaw.net/
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20070810205256644
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20080803065719599


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/11/technology/11novell.html

http://wraltechwire.com/business/tech_wire/opinion/blogpost/7826766/

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/06/scowned-no-new-trial-novell-can-shut-down-ibm-lawsuit/

http://www.ericgoldman.org/Articles/scovunix.pdf




CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the court concludes that Novell is the owner of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights. Therefore, SCO's First Claim for Relief for slander of title and Third Claim for Relief for specific performance are dismissed, as are the copyright ownership portions of SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief for unfair competition and Second Claim for Relief for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court denies SCO's cross-motion for summary judgment on its own slander of title, breach of contract, and unfair competition claims, and on Novell's slander of title claim. Accordingly, Novell's slander of title claim is still at issue.

The court also concludes that, to the extent that SCO has a copyright to enforce, SCO can simultaneously pursue both a copyright infringement claim and a breach of contract claim based on the non-compete restrictions in the license back of the Licensed Technology under APA and the TLA. The court further concludes that there has not been a change of control that released the non-compete restrictions of the license, and the non-compete restrictions of the license are not void under California law. Accordingly, Novell's motion for summary judgment on SCO's non-compete claim in its Second Claim for breach of contract and Fifth Claim for Relief for unfair competition is granted to the extent that SCO's claims require ownership of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights, and denied in all other regards.

Furthermore, the court concludes, as a matter of law, that the only reasonable interpretation of the term "SVRX License" in the APA is all licenses related to the SVRX products listed in Item VI of Schedule 1.1(a) to the APA. Therefore, Novell is entitled to a declaration of rights under its Fourth Claim for Relief that it was and is entitled, at its sole discretion, to direct SCO to waive its claims against IBM and Sequent, and SCO is obligated to recognize Novell's waiver of SCO's claims against IBM and Sequent. Accordingly, Novell's motion for partial summary judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief for declaratory judgment is granted, and SCO's cross-motion for summary judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief is denied.

Finally, the court concludes, as a matter of law, that the only reasonably interpretation of all SVRX Licenses includes no temporal restriction of SVRX Licenses existing at the time of the APA. The court further concludes that because a portion of SCO's 2003 Sun and Microsoft Agreements indisputably licenses SVRX products listed under Item VI of Schedule 1.1(a) to the APA, even if only incidental to a license for UnixWare, SCO is obligated under the APA to account for and pass through to Novell the appropriate portion relating to the license of SVRX products. Because SCO failed to do so, it breached its fiduciary duty to Novell under the APA and is liable for conversion.

The court, however, is precluded from granting a constructive trust with respect to the payments SCO received under the 2003 Sun and Microsoft Agreements because there is a question of fact as to the appropriate amount of SVRX Royalties SCO owes to Novell based on the portion of SVRX products contained in each agreement. Furthermore, because Novell has obtained the information that it would otherwise obtain through an accounting during the course of this litigation, the court denies Novell's Ninth Claim for Relief for an accounting. However, the court also notes that SCO has a continuing contractual obligation to comply with the accounting and reporting requirements set forth in the APA.

Accordingly, Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 147] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims [Docket No. 180] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim [Docket No. 171] is GRANTED; SCO's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim [Docket No. 224] is DENIED; SCO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its First, Second, and Fifth Claims and Novell's First Claim [Docket No. 258] is DENIED; Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright Ownership of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [Docket No. 271] is GRANTED; Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claims in its Second and Fifth Claims [Docket No. 273] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [Docket No. 275] is GRANTED; and Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title for Failure to Establish Special Damages [Docket No. 277] is MOOT.

DATED this 10th day of August, 2007.

BY THE COURT:

__
DALE A. KIMBALL, United States District Judge
Malemute

Ice climber
the ghost
Jan 1, 2013 - 08:47pm PT
Why are you asking this here? First, it was driving records and legal stuff. Now, it's computer info that would be best answered on another forum.
Maybe cause his posts would be mocked on a forum where people are computer savvy.
weezy

climber
Jan 2, 2013 - 12:00am PT
B_E_S: the abstract expressionist of Supertopo.

For when Norwegian just isn't cutting it for your nethermost surrealist compulsions.
Hardman Knott

Gym climber
Muir Woods National Monument, Mill Valley, Ca
Jan 2, 2013 - 12:08am PT
Credit: Hardman Knott
Gary

Social climber
Right outside of Delacroix
Jan 4, 2013 - 12:42am PT
There are no legal issues with BSD. They did get rid of the demon though.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Jan 4, 2013 - 12:59am PT
They did get rid of the demon though.

An exorcism?
Messages 1 - 20 of total 100 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Trip Report and Articles
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews